C. ;. Aceves and . Athès,

P. Buche,

G. D. Valle, ;. V. Farines, ;. Fonseca, and ;. Guillard,

K. Kansou,

M. Kristiawan and ;. Monclus,

J. Mouret, ;. Ndiaye, ;. Neveu, ;. S. Passot, ;. Sablayrolles et al., The virtual food system: innovative models and experiential feedback in technologies for winemaking, the cereals chain, food packaging and eco-designed starter production, Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, vol.46, pp.54-64, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/lirmm-01651998

H. ;. Belhouchette, ;. Louhichi, ;. Therond, ;. Mouratiadou, and . Wery,

M. Van-ittersum, ;. , and G. Flichman, Assessing the impact of the Nitrate Directive on farming systems using a bioeconomic modelling chain, Agricultural Systems, vol.104, issue.2, pp.135-145, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01186937

V. Belton and T. Stewart, « Problem structuring and multiple criteria decision analysis, Trends in multiple criteria decision analysis, pp.209-239, 2010.

P. ;. Bisquert, ;. Croitoru, and N. Karanikolas, A qualitative decision-making approach overlapping argumentation and social choice, Algorithmic decision theory, pp.344-349, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01606501

J. R. Bourguet and . Thomopoulos,

M. L. Mugnier, ;. , and J. Abécassis, An artificial intelligence-based approach to deal with argumentation applied to food quality and public health policy, Expert Systems with Applications, vol.40, pp.4539-4546, 2013.

P. M. Dung, On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence, vol.77, pp.321-357, 1995.

M. Fishbein, A behavior theory approach to the relations between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward the object, Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement, pp.389-400, 1967.

©. Eurosis-eti,

M. Geist, Using the Delphi method to engage stakeholders: A comparison of two studies, Evaluation and Program Planning, vol.33, pp.147-154, 2010.

A. Hutchel and H. Molet, Rational modelling in understanding and aiding human decision-making: About two case studies, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.24, issue.1, pp.178-186, 1986.

M. ;. Marttunen, ;. Lienert, and V. Belton, Structuring problems for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in practice: A literature review of method combinations, European Journal of Operational Research, vol.263, issue.1, pp.1-17, 2017.

C. O'faircheallaigh, Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol.30, issue.1, pp.19-27, 2010.

R. ;. Ortiz and . Sayre,

B. Govaerts,

R. V. Gupta;-g, ;. Subbarao, and . Ban,

D. ;. Hodson, ;. Dixon, ;. Ortiz-monasterio, and M. Reynolds, Climate change: Can wheat beat the heat?, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, vol.126, issue.1-2, pp.46-58, 2008.

E. Picavet, Opportunities and pitfalls for ethical analysis in operations research and the management sciences, Omega, vol.37, pp.1121-1131, 2009.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00476559

N. Salliou and R. Thomopoulos, Modelling Multicriteria Argument Networks about Reduced Meat Consumption, Proceedings of FoodSim, pp.46-51, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01837516

M. Siegrist and B. Sütterlin, Importance of perceived naturalness for acceptance of food additives and cultured meat, Appetite, vol.113, issue.1, pp.320-326, 2017.

R. Thomopoulos, A Practical Application Approach to Argumentation for Multicriteria Analysis and Decision Support, EURO Journal on Decision Processes, vol.6, issue.3, pp.237-255, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01918020

F. Wenstop and H. Koppang, On operations research and value conflicts, Omega, vol.37, pp.1109-1120, 2009.